So
Karen Healey posted about writer-hate as it is found on the internet,
especially with respect to the gender of the authors in question, which
led to all kinds of interesting discussion. But what I want to post
about today is not really continuing that conversation, so much as it is
looking at one interesting nugget Karen's research turned up, and
taking that off on a tangent.
She found several instances of
people hating on writers for killing off or punishing their favorite
characters (including having their favorite characters not chosen in a
love triangle), or for just generally making them cry. And while I think
"hate" is a strong word, and Heaven knows I don't advocate hating
writers, that subset of comments made me think a lot about what I
believe they're really saying, and about what happens between writer and
reader.
As writers, we ask readers to make an emotional
investment. And when they do, sometimes they get hurt, because the story
doesn't always turn out the way they would have wished. The underlying
message of so many of those comments was,
Why did you hurt the
character I loved so much? Why did that character not get the nice
ending I thought he deserved? Why did you make me cry, Author? Why did
you make me feel sad?I'm a reader as well as a writer, and I
know where those readers are coming from. My two favorite characters
got killed, quite brutally, in
Lord of the Flies. I have a prize-winning record of choosing the loser in love triangles. The ending of Zilpha Keatley Snyder's
Below the Root trilogy devastated me. I still cannot read the end of
Charlotte's Web without choking up. And we will not even speak of
Old Yeller. Sometimes I read certain books with my breath held, thinking, "Please don't kill that character."
But I'm a writer. And one of the things writers are taught to do--
taught because,
you see, it often doesn't come naturally--is hurt their characters.
Without pain, there is nothing at stake. Without conflict, there is no
story. And every character cannot get a happy ending for a few reasons:
it doesn't happen that way in real life; and if the main character
always triumphed, there would be no suspense to any story, because they
would all end the same way. And finally, most importantly, the bottom
line for a writer is to serve the story, to convey a theme. If a
character has to die to fit that theme, then that character has to die. I
attended a panel discussion today that was part of the
Breathless Reads tour,
and Beth Revis warned the audience that none of her characters are
safe. In other words, she will sacrifice any character for the good of
the story.
Certain stories are more powerful when you like the
character who's going to get the short end of the stick, when you see
the attractiveness of the villain, when you care about whatever is lost
in the story. And that is why a writer may work to form an attachment
between the reader and the doomed character.
Plus, you want to know a secret? Sometimes the
writer cries about killing off that character, too.