Imagine that some creative work you produced in your late teens--for which you had high hopes, but it never went anywhere then--has been "discovered" decades later. This work that's so far in your past is current and fresh to others. It's what they know you for. Whatever directions you've taken since then, however much you've changed, now you must revisit that old work.
This is the premise of True Story, volume 1, a nonfiction essay called "Fruitland."
Two young brothers recorded an album in the late 1970s, which only
received wide attention and celebration within the past few years. It
makes for an interesting read, but it also made me question how much of
my own adolescent writing I would still stand behind. I'm a better
writer now, I hope. My perspective on many issues has changed; I'm much
more politically aware now. There's little of my unpublished work from
back then that I would care to put forward now.
And yet, who
would want to turn away new fans, no matter how belated the attention,
no matter how far we've come since creating that work? We all know that
some artists aren't even discovered until after they're dead.
just reminds me that fate is quirky, and art is unpredictable, and we
never know where the dandelion seeds of our work will drift and take